To the Editor at ??The Village Voice??:
I’m not quite sure what David Shaftel was hoping to accomplish in his front page article “”Jaws: The Making of a Vicious Pit Bull”:http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0534,shaftel,67093,5.html”, but it would have been more accurate to title it “Ignorance and the Perpetuation of a Stereotype”
While I found the story about irresponsible breeder Tyler Eison interesting, I was disturbed by the implicit characterization of all pitbulls as monsters. The animals that Eison produces are mixed breed machines, relegated to chains outdoors, ruthlessly agitated and goaded into service to please their master by killing when he wills. Eison defends his actions by saying that his dogs are “his pistols,” and “essential protection.” This is a pretty weak argument given that the mere presence of any large dog at all has been shown to prevent attacks and robberies. Having a weapon to protect you is different than having a 9mm loaded, cocked, and pointed at anyone that approaches you.
Shaftel seems bent on highlighting false ideas about the violence of pits, and seems to glorify their use as a weapon. Statements like, “these dogs were born to fight” and “they will fight to the death just to please you” lead most readers to believe that pits have a natural aggression towards humans. However, solid research into the history of pits will uncover that they were never bred to be aggressive to humans, and were instead developed for an intense prey drive and dog aggression, while maintaining one of the most stable temperaments of any dog around humans. There is a critical distinction between human aggression and animal aggression (which all dogs have in varying degrees). Yet, Shaftel never takes the trouble to note the difference between the pitbulls bred with human aggressive dogs and raised in fear, and the majority of pitbulls that are nothing short of wonderful dogs and trustworthy companions.
This article seemed only to paint a sadly accurate picture of how certain sick people exploit the natural strength and athleticism of pitbulls, just as they have with other breeds such as Rottweilers and Dobermans. And just as the inflammatory picture on the cover made me dread reading the article, the close of the article left a bad taste in my mouth, insinuating that a man-killer is a good example of the breed, and a product of the best bloodlines. Shaftel rides the negative media attention surrounding pits, appealing to the dark part in all of us that craves the thrill of a witch hunt, and allows us to envision all pitbulls as “bloodthirsty killers”:http://www.kennsarah.net/photos/dina-weena/dsc01647.jpg.html. Thank you for adding to the irrational public fear that already surrounds this breed.